Joan, Jane, John etc...Meet Dr., Dr. Dr.

My "Tara" experience came early in my psych experience.  "Tara" is the character played by Toni Collette on "The United States of Tara", the Showtime TV show about a middle-aged, married, mother of 2 kids who has dissociative identity disorder. For the older folks this disease is aka multiple-personality disorder (MPD) and was associated with "Eve" and "Sybil", who are unknown by my 20 something colleagues.

It became apparent very quickly that I was totally ill prepared for the Tara experience with my Barbara Bates (Hx and PE textbook author), linear, history and physical examination style. There is nothing linear about the "new patient" work-up of a multiple, particularly as the personalities come out and interject, or worse, correct each other. Such was my experience.

I sat with Joan, Jane, John and some other un-named personalities for a long time hearing the history, fact, details, summaries, ranting, ravings, lies, delusions and such. It was the most entertaining hour I've ever spent in medicine and I'm a better provider for it. But my real conundrum as a provider came the moment I sat, pen hovering over the progress note page, and tried to write this encounter up in some manner that was intelligible and demonstrated my expertise as a medical professional:

"Personality #1 (called herself Jane) related a history of sexual abuse at the hand of her father and noted no other physical, verbal, emotional, financial or sexual abuse history. Personality #2 (Joan, deeper voice with faster cadence and visible tremor left hand) immediately corrected "Jane" and noted that she had been financially abused by a Texan with a big car just a few day before this visit. Personality #3 (John) then noted that Jane was Jealous, and that Jane and John were really wanting the Texan's money..."

And so it went. And who was Jealous? John was actually talking about another personality, within a personality. Apparently personalities can have names of emotions  too...a variant presentation.

I have to admit, I felt a bit hoodwinked but still entertained. That's the thing about Psychiatry in general. There are no blood tests or real objective testing for many of the diseases we encounter. Such is the case with MPD, now DID. The interview is all we have. And if it is, we are totally unprepared. At least I am. But then, that was the best afternoons so far. No wonder Tara is a hit show on Showtime.

Mental Health

Who we are, and how we respond to our environment as a living, breathing, interacting organism is a function of our nervous system. And that nervous system made of nerves, our spine and our brain is largely a function of chemicals...norepinephrine, epinephrine, serotonin and dopamine. So beyond limited therapies of counseling (a mainstay of psychiatric care), restraint (physical and chemical), and controversial surgical and electrical brain intervention; Psychiatry is largely an attempt to modify those chemicals.  Today, 4 % of men and 10 % of women in this country are taking antidepressants at any given time according to Dr. Julian Whitaker.

So the day to day operations of a psychiatry office, and the function of a student in that environment, is the management of those drugs that attempt to modify those chemicals. The drug names of many, varied, and often entertaining....and  there are MANY, with new ones coming out almost hourly. You can barely get through a TV show without seeing a commercial for one.  We sell psychiatric illness and the "cure". It has become the mainstream of what we do in psychiatry and sales have skyrocketed from about $500 million to the current almost $60 BILLLION in only about 20 years. It is BIG business and the number of drug company sponsored lunches I have eaten while doing my psych rotation is testament to the amount of expendable dollars available due to these sales figures.

"The way to sell drugs is to sell psychiatric illness."----Dr. Carl Elliot, University of Minnesota Bioethicist (The Washington Post, 2001).

And while I feel well fed, and likely that some people actually need this care to survive life, much of what we do in psych is suspect at best and in some cases dangerous. Dr. Peter Breggin, M.D. says, "Going to a psychiatrist has become one of the most dangerous things a person can do", referring to the chemical approach to care.

And we continue to sell both disease and illness to a large percentage of "patients" walking thru the door, but the stories are largely of "life" and the stressors we encounter along the way. Has our ability to handle life and the massive stressors been exceeded or do we just look differently at that ability (and possible treatment)? It appears that current psychiatric practice is largely the latter.

"[W]e do not know the causes [of any mental disorder]. We don’t have the methods of ‘curing’ these illnesses yet.”----Dr. Rex Cowdry, director of the National Institute for Mental Health (NIMH), testimony before a House of Representatives Appropriations Committee Hearing

But there are some severely wounded people out there with real, significant and life strangling psychiatric issues. And it's those people that we daily struggle to help live a life with some quality and as few bumps, injuries and maladies as possible. And it's largely that hope that keeps the doors open, and the drug company lunches coming. We really want to help those in need, but we continue to invent, modify, and alter need. It is a grand experiment for sure.

"Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist ought to have his head examined."-- Samuel Goldwyn

"Biological psychology/psychiatry is a total perversion of medicine and science, and a fraud."— Neurologist Fred Baughman

"Psychiatry is probably the single most destructive force that has affected American Society within the last fifty years." – Dr. Thomas Szasz, Lifetime Fellow, American Psychiatric Association

One Down, Some To Go

The first rotation is about over and time to reflect and transition to the next. I've really enjoyed the site, preceptor and the plethora of pathology. GREAT learning for sure. I also know that a constant diet of diseased vaginas, cervices, uteri and ovaries won't be my full time gig anytime in the future. Great to know that I understand the nuances of the specialty though. I'm sure I'll see much of this again.

It's been quite the tour of the female system in health and wellness from the technically specific presentation on pipette removal of egg parts and sperm chromosome modification of grand rounds, to the more mundane emergent patient presentations of membrane rupture, premature labor and peri-natal bleeding. It's also been quite the education in the finances and politics of healthcare. A sad, sad commentary on how the U.S. treats it's citizens and the right to healthcare.

I find it fascinating that while we pay taxes to keep public school running in almost every state and jurisdiction in the country, we have the most split, fractioned mechanisms for providing basic health care to the populations most at need. I find it unconscionable that we spend billions on destruction and rebuilding other countries and find it hard to find moneys' to address the core nutrition, peri-natal, and women's health care services. To be more specific would violate HIPAA and many other federal laws, but to not feel the issue at the jugular level is inhumane.

So we move through the day, one patient at a time, doing what we can do. I appreciate that there are some seasoned clinicians who have the time, resources, morals and ethics to do what is necessary, when it's necessary for who needs it most. I've been lucky to meet and work with some of them this past month. Hope the next one is more of the same.